首页> 外文OA文献 >Does generic entry lower the prices paid for pharmaceuticals in Australia? A comparison before and after the introduction of the mandatory price-reduction policy
【2h】

Does generic entry lower the prices paid for pharmaceuticals in Australia? A comparison before and after the introduction of the mandatory price-reduction policy

机译:仿制药进入是否会降低澳大利亚药品的价格?实施强制性降价政策前后的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objective We investigated the relationship between the number of generic medicines and pharmaceutical prices over time in Australia. Methods A dataset was utilised containing 76 items for 4 years (2003-2007) on the national subsidy scheme - the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) - for which a generic brand is available. The PBS price was used as the dependent variable, and the number of generics available the key explanatory variable. The ordinary least-squares estimator was adopted for estimation. In the robustness analysis, an instrumental-variables method was used to account for potential endogeneity. Results Results suggested that the effect of increased generic medicine sellers on reducing the prices paid for generics is marginal but statistically significant. Conclusions It is suggested that structural changes to the way generic prices are determined needs to be reconsidered by the Australian government if the policy aim of using increased 'competition' to lower prices is to be maximised. What is known about the topic? There is scant empirical evidence that supports the notion that increased generic availability for pharmaceuticals, in heavily price-regulated markets such as Australia, has a significant effect on lowering the prices paid over time. Despite this, Australia has adopted a policy that promotes increased generic 'competition' as a means of controlling prices, without establishing if this policy has, or is likely to be, successful in the longer term. What does this paper add? Using longitudinal data from Medicare Australia, this paper quantifies the relationship between the number of branded and generic items of a given drug molecule and formulation, and prices paid over time, controlling for other explanatory variables. What are the implications for practitioners? The results suggest that although increased generic entry may lower prices over time in the Australian context, the price reduction gained is likely to be very small. Therefore, whilst generic entry should be encouraged, it is important not to assume that this price-lowering effect is realised without question and that the magnitude of such an effect is comparable with other price-regulated countries.
机译:目的我们调查了澳大利亚一段时间内仿制药的数量与药品价格之间的关系。方法利用数据集,该数据集包含76个项目(为期4年(2003-2007年)),采用的是国家补贴计划-药品福利计划(PBS)-对于该计划可获得通用品牌。 PBS价格用作因变量,而可用的仿制药数量则是关键的解释变量。采用普通的最小二乘估计器进行估计。在稳健性分析中,使用了一种工具变量方法来解释潜在的内生性。结果结果表明,增加仿制药销售商对降低仿制药支付价格的影响很小,但具有统计学意义。结论建议,如果要最大程度地利用“竞争”来降低价格的政策目标,澳大利亚政府应重新考虑确定通用价格的方式的结构变化。有关该主题的知识是什么?很少有经验证据支持这样的观点,即在澳大利亚等价格受到严格管制的市场中,提高药品的通用性对降低随时间而支付的价格具有重大影响。尽管如此,澳大利亚已经采取了一项政策,即通过增加通用的“竞争”作为控制价格的手段,而没有确定该政策在长期内是否已经或可能会成功。本文增加了什么?本文使用澳大利亚医疗保险的纵向数据,量化了给定药物分子和配方的品牌和非专利品数量与随时间推移支付的价格之间的关系,并控制了其他解释变量。对从业者有什么影响?结果表明,尽管在澳大利亚范围内增加的仿制药品进口可能会随着时间的推移降低价格,但获得的降价幅度可能很小。因此,尽管应该鼓励仿制药进入市场,但重要的是不要假定这种降价效应是毫无疑问实现的,并且这种效应的程度可与其他受价格管制的国家相提并论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号